01 · OBSERVE

Development Assessment

Review five areas of development and choose a training priority to evaluate over two weeks.

PLAYER CONTEXT

Player information

Inputs stay in this browser

Age bandDevelopment stage

Court / training hours each week2hIndependent sessions each week0Matches each month0

FIVE CONNECTED PILLARS · 1 LOW / 5 HIGHTechnical repeatability3Can the player reproduce the intended shape, contact, and recovery?Tactical decision quality2Does shot selection fit position, time, score, and ball quality?Physical readiness3Can movement, balance, and recovery support the intended game?Competitive transfer2Do practice gains survive scoring, pressure, and unfamiliar opponents?Learning environment3Are goals, feedback, practice, and competition working from the same plan?

PROFILE BALANCE INDEX52/ 100

A conversation aid, not a validated player rating.

STRONGEST CURRENT PILLAR

Learning environment

PRIMARY CONSTRAINT HYPOTHESIS

Tactical decision quality

Does shot selection fit position, time, score, and ball quality?

14-DAY EVIDENCE TEST

Tag 20 points by situation: attack, neutral, defend, or reset. Record whether the first decision matched the situation.

QUESTION FOR THE COACH

Which recurring decision pattern should we train before adding more stroke work?

Checks before increasing load

○ No obvious structural flag. Validate the lowest-rated pillar with video or match evidence.

STRUCTURED HANDOFF

Continue the analysis in ChatGPT

Copy a bounded, privacy-conscious brief. No model call is made here.

Tool outputs organize development questions. They do not provide medical advice, official pathway guidance, talent identification, or outcome guarantees.